Regional employees
Map local tools, languages, work patterns, holidays, reporting routes, and employee-support owners for every included population.
Global teams collaborate across countries, languages, time zones, legal entities, employment models, devices, and local service providers.
A responsible simulation should preserve one clear learning objective while adapting delivery, support, privacy review, and interpretation to each included population.
Remote-work scenarios • Device-aware planning • Trusted reporting • Contextual measurement
Start with the channels, devices, time zones, identities, and support routes involved in the selected workflow. Remote employees need a verification action they can complete without relying on the suspicious message or walking to a local help desk.
Map local tools, languages, work patterns, holidays, reporting routes, and employee-support owners for every included population.
Confirm which entity is authorized to train, monitor, support, and retain results for non-employees.
Practice finance, HR, IT, and collaboration decisions while ensuring regional employees can reach the authentic owner.
Prepare managers and response teams to answer questions and protect real-incident reporting in the participant's language and schedule.
Give the scenario one learning objective and use fictional colleagues, organizations, projects, files, and incidents. Keep the campaign inside approved workplace channels and supported devices.
Practice validating an invented owner, project, access request, and destination across the approved collaboration service.
Ask employees to reach the authentic local workforce service without using an unexpected sign-in link.
Use a fictional routine transaction and a verification route available in the participant's region.
Reinforce contacting the known local or global support route before granting access or sharing a code.
| Consideration | Question to answer | Required preparation |
|---|---|---|
| Authority and review | Which entity employs or contracts each audience, and what local review applies? | Document authority, notice, consultation, privacy, labor, data, and follow-up requirements by population. |
| Localization | Does the scenario, tone, sender, and expected action make sense in each language and culture? | Use qualified local review and pilot meaning, not only literal translation. |
| Time zones | Will security, support, HR, and managers be available when the message arrives? | Stagger equivalent deliveries or provide staffed regional and asynchronous response routes. |
| Cross-border data | Where will recipient events be processed, accessed, retained, and reported? | Collect the minimum approved data and resolve transfer, access, retention, and aggregation before launch. |
State the request being tested, expected verification or reporting action, authorized audience, supported channels, and intended use of campaign events.
Make sure employees can independently reach the authentic service, directory, support contact, reporting tool, or manager from their normal location and device.
Test supported devices, mail clients, browsers, accessibility tools, time zones, email controls, landing pages, reports, and follow-up material.
Prepare security, IT, communications, managers, and providers to support the exercise while continuing to treat unrelated reports as real.
Provide a prompt explanation employees can access across schedules, offer a question route, and assign each workflow or control improvement to an owner.
Source: NIST Guide to Enterprise Telework, Remote Access, and BYOD Security
Record intended recipients, exclusions, successful deliveries, unique recipient events, verified reports, response handling, and completed follow-up. Reconcile security-tool automation and repeated events before attributing activity to an employee.
Interpret results with country, entity, language, culture, time zone, holiday, device, employment status, delivery, scenario, and support in view. Do not use a global percentage to erase regional differences.
Use the review to improve reporting, identity, remote access, collaboration, device, provider, or support processes. One campaign interaction does not explain why a decision occurred and should not become an employee risk score.
Common questions about Phishmake's features, onboarding, and support, answered to help you get started with confidence.
Not automatically. Verify that its sender, tone, workflow, risk, expected action, reporting route, and support make sense in each location, and complete the applicable local review.
No. Language, culture, audience size, scenario relevance, timing, delivery, security controls, and support differ. Use contextual results to improve regional and global processes.
Only after resolving authority, employer responsibilities, notice, policy, devices, support, data access, result visibility, and follow-up for the contractor population.
Use equivalent staggered delivery with local support where possible, or publish an asynchronous reporting route and response expectation. Record delivery relative to working hours.
Explore how Phishmake connects controlled workforce simulations, relevant training, campaign activity, and follow-up reporting in one workflow.