Owner and office staff
Practice urgent payment, payroll, benefits, tax, and account requests while preserving established approval and callback steps.
Small manufacturers often run production, purchasing, payroll, shipping, maintenance, and IT with a lean group of employees and outside providers.
A focused simulation can practice one valuable decision without creating an elaborate program or drawing scarce support away from safe operations.
Workflow-specific scenarios • OT safety boundaries • Reporting practice • Measured follow-up
Start with the people, systems, and verification routes involved in the selected workflow. The exercise should practice an action employees can take without affecting production or safety.
Practice urgent payment, payroll, benefits, tax, and account requests while preserving established approval and callback steps.
Use fictional vendors and deliveries to reinforce verification of invoices, bank changes, portal notices, and attachments.
Include only employees for whom the channel is relevant, and provide a reporting route that works with their device access and line responsibilities.
Agree how the IT provider will recognize the exercise, handle reports, preserve real-incident response, and share results with the manufacturer.
Give every scenario one learning objective and one explainable next step. Use fictional business details and avoid active production events, supplier disputes, recalls, or safety incidents.
Practice calling a known supplier contact and following the normal approval process before changing account details.
Ask employees to open the normal service independently rather than following an unexpected sign-in link.
Reinforce checking whether the sender and document match an expected fictional delivery before opening or forwarding it.
Practice contacting the known IT provider before installing software, sharing a code, or granting access.
| Consideration | Question to answer | Required preparation |
|---|---|---|
| Named owner | Who approves the scenario, handles questions, stops the exercise, and ensures follow-up? | Assign one accountable person and a backup even when security is not their full-time role. |
| Provider coordination | Does an external provider manage email, identity, devices, or incident response? | Agree campaign scope, test accounts, report handling, event interpretation, and availability before launch. |
| Operational timing | Does the window overlap payroll, month-end, major shipments, maintenance, audits, or constrained production? | Choose a lower-pressure period with management and technical support available. |
| Useful follow-up | What realistic improvement can the business make after the review? | Prioritize one reporting, callback, identity, email, backup, access, or provider process change. |
State the request being tested, the expected verification or reporting action, the authorized audience, and how the result will be used.
Keep the exercise out of OT, production, safety, quality, and emergency systems. Record exclusions, owners, escalation contacts, and stop conditions.
Test representative accounts, shifts, devices, email controls, links, landing pages, event records, reporting routes, and follow-up material.
Prepare security, IT, plant support, communications, and relevant providers to recognize the authorized exercise while treating unrelated reports as real.
Explain the message cues and expected action, provide relevant learning, and assign each workflow or control improvement to an owner.
Source: CISA Cybersecurity Scenarios
Record intended recipients, exclusions, successful deliveries, unique recipient events, verified reports, response handling, and completed follow-up. Reconcile automated link inspection and repeated events before attributing an action to an employee.
In a small audience, one employee can create a large percentage change. Always show recipient counts, delivery, scanner activity, reports, and scenario context, and avoid public rankings or conclusions based on a single event.
Use the review to improve a real verification, reporting, identity, email, supplier, or support process. A simulation result does not measure the security of production systems and should not be treated as an individual employee risk score.
Common questions about Phishmake's features, onboarding, and support, answered to help you get started with confidence.
Begin with approved test accounts, then use an audience small enough that the owner and support provider can handle questions and follow-up. There is no required minimum campaign size.
A provider can support delivery and reporting, but the manufacturer should still approve the objective, audience, scenario, data handling, operational boundaries, communications, and follow-up.
There is no universal good rate, and small-group percentages change sharply with one event. Review actual counts, reports, delivery, scenario difficulty, workflow gaps, and completed improvements together.
Debrief the expected action, give relevant private follow-up, fix the most important verification or reporting gap, and choose the next exercise only after that improvement has an owner.
Explore how Phishmake connects authorized employee simulations, relevant training, campaign activity, and follow-up reporting in one workflow.