Client service
Practice secure document and portal decisions without imitating a real client, filing issue, notice, or distressed request.
Accounting firms exchange client documents, tax records, payroll files, invoices, bank details, and cloud-service invitations—often under seasonal deadline pressure.
A responsible simulation should practice independent verification without copying client records, exploiting tax anxiety, or disrupting a live filing and payment workflow.
Role-specific scenarios • Customer-data boundaries • Reporting practice • Contextual measurement
Begin with a decision employees already make and the approved way to verify it. The exercise should support the institution's security program without entering production accounts, payments, customer systems, or regulated records.
Practice secure document and portal decisions without imitating a real client, filing issue, notice, or distressed request.
Use invented records and avoid periods when a scenario could be confused with a consequential filing, deposit, or employee-payment action.
Reinforce known callback and approval routes for invoices, wire instructions, supplier details, and account access.
Confirm onboarding, identity, device, policy, support, and data responsibilities before including temporary personnel.
Give each scenario one learning objective and one explainable next step. Use fictional customers, organizations, accounts, transactions, and documents, and avoid active fraud, hardship, investigation, or market events.
Practice validating a fictional client, file owner, engagement context, permissions request, and destination.
Ask staff to confirm invented bank details through a saved client contact and established approval step.
Reinforce opening the known service independently rather than signing in through an unexpected update or expiry link.
Practice escalating a fictional sensitive-file request without attaching, forwarding, or exposing real employee data.
| Consideration | Question to answer | Required preparation |
|---|---|---|
| Client confidentiality | Could the message reveal a client, engagement, filing, payroll, or financial condition? | Use invented names and records and review every message, destination, export, and debrief. |
| Seasonal timing | Does the campaign overlap tax, audit, payroll, month-end, or reporting deadlines? | Choose a lower-pressure period with management and technical support available. |
| Temporary staff | Are seasonal employees covered by policy, training, support, and the approved exercise scope? | Reconcile the audience and provide the real verification process before campaign delivery. |
| Provider coordination | Who manages email, identity, devices, cloud services, and incident response? | Test reporting and escalation with the responsible provider using approved accounts. |
State the request being tested, expected verification or reporting action, authorized audience, permitted data, and intended use of the findings.
Verify that employees can use the documented callback, approval, reporting, identity, or escalation route before asking them to practice it.
Test representative accounts, locations, devices, email controls, landing pages, event records, reports, response handling, and follow-up material.
Prepare security, fraud, compliance, privacy, IT, operations, communications, and relevant providers while preserving normal handling of real incidents.
Explain the expected action, provide relevant private learning, and assign each process or control improvement to an accountable owner.
Record intended recipients, exclusions, successful deliveries, unique recipient events, verified reports, response handling, and completed follow-up. Reconcile automated inspection and repeated events before attributing activity to an employee.
Show actual counts beside percentages and note role, employment status, workload, device, delivery, scenario relevance, and reporting access. Seasonal timing can materially change participation and should be recorded.
Use the review to improve reporting, payment verification, identity, email, access, vendor, or support controls. A simulation does not test transaction systems or establish the effectiveness of an institution's entire information security or compliance program.
Common questions about Phishmake's features, onboarding, and support, answered to help you get started with confidence.
Avoid real or high-distress tax notices, investigations, penalties, refunds, and filing problems. Use a neutral fictional workflow that will not prompt consequential client action.
Only when they are in the approved scope, have received the relevant process, and can access reporting, support, and appropriate follow-up. A simulation should not replace onboarding.
No. Use invented clients, documents, figures, accounts, and deadlines. Real financial and tax records are unnecessary for practicing verification.
A fictional client document share or vendor bank-detail change provides a clear independent verification action without relying on an urgent tax or payroll event.
Explore how Phishmake connects controlled employee simulations, relevant training, campaign activity, and follow-up reporting in one workflow.